Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 13:27:38 -0500 From: Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net> To: Andrey Fesenko <f0andrey@gmail.com>,Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Konstantin Belousov <kib@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Testing i915kms/Haswell on Intel 4th generation grpahics Message-ID: <4B59882A-98ED-41B7-8F9E-C5B3DB6F2B4D@metricspace.net> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BK5SrOzrzw8WoKLL_eQgUx-OsDjDNBBhsxZVsSGk8%2Bnipm-Fg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20150106044154.50171e38@bsd64.grem.de> <CA%2BK5SrOzrzw8WoKLL_eQgUx-OsDjDNBBhsxZVsSGk8%2Bnipm-Fg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
What exactly is the status of these patches? Are they supposed to support haswell graphics and in need of debugging? If so, I could try them on my system. On January 6, 2015 11:05:16 PM EST, Andrey Fesenko <f0andrey@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I took kib's patches from https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/ and merged >> them into CURRENT (a couple of changes in vm). I also added my >chipset >> id to pciids, i915 and agp. >> >> The merged/updated patch can be found here: >> >> http://blog.grem.de/bits/haswellgfx_20150106.patch >> > >You patch not contain i915_gem_stolen.c, intel_ddi.c, intel_pm.c and >not build, this files exist >https://www.kib.kiev.ua/kib/drm/i915.8.patch > >I'm have i5-4570 >pciconf >vgapci0@pci0:0:2:0: class=0x030000 card=0xd0001458 chip=0x04128086 >rev=0x06 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Intel Corporation' > device = 'Haswell Integrated Graphics Controller' > class = display > subclass = VGA >bar [10] = type Memory, range 64, base 0xf0000000, size 4194304, >enabled > bar [18] = type Prefetchable Memory, range 64, base 0xe0000000, >size 268435456, enabled > bar [20] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xf000, size 64, enabled > cap 05[90] = MSI supports 1 message > cap 01[d0] = powerspec 2 supports D0 D3 current D0 > cap 13[a4] = PCI Advanced Features: FLR TP > >If after rebuild kernel and restart, set drm.debug=2 and kldload >i915kms system crushed. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Sent from my Blackphone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 18:55:29 2015 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97318201 for <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.made4.biz (mail.made4.biz [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:c018::1:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58B6CDA2 for <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 18:55:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 2a02-8428-011b-e000-0290-f5ff-fe9d-b78c.rev.sfr.net ([2a02:8428:11b:e000:290:f5ff:fe9d:b78c] helo=magellan.dumbbell.fr) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.84 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <jean-sebastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr>) id 1Y9eiU-000AVm-K2 for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 19:55:26 +0100 Message-ID: <54B0241A.3000808@dumbbell.fr> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 19:55:22 +0100 From: =?windows-1252?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= <jean-sebastien.pedron@dumbbell.fr> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg-server: What's the point of the devd backend? References: <slrnm9c6is.1rja.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> In-Reply-To: <slrnm9c6is.1rja.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bIPxwDKrgObCseusVqxt3x682ut8qdjgS" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support <freebsd-x11.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-x11>, <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-x11@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11>, <mailto:freebsd-x11-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:55:29 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --bIPxwDKrgObCseusVqxt3x682ut8qdjgS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21.12.2014 01:54, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > I could understand the direction if kbdmux and sysmouse were on > their way out, but I'm pretty sure this won't happen, because people > who use the plain console would be up in arms over it. So we are > stuck with this silly situation of two competing auto-attachment > layers, both enabled by default, one preempting the other. I agree that kbdmux(4) and moused(8) are a pain from the point of view of the X.Org server. One nice advantage of the devd backend is that I can turn on/off kbdmux(4) or moused(8) without having to migrate the keyboard layout configuration for instance. Also, I can copy the xorg.conf chunk from computer to computer. I admit these are rare use cases. But I don't think the backend add much complexity. And it makes the X.Org server to behave more like on Linux. Input device handling on FreeBSD is quite basic and we have a lot of work in this area to modernize it. The evdev GSoC (which will hit HEAD I hope) is one step in this direction. We could also improve vt(4) to handle multiple keyboards. --=20 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron --bIPxwDKrgObCseusVqxt3x682ut8qdjgS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUsCQaXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NzA4N0ZEMUFFQUUwRTEyREJDNkE2RjAz OUU5OTc2MUE1RkQ5NENDAAoJEDnpl2Gl/ZTMo4cP/1zc+t2tWZvj7HYeTqWyEOax pFRIwkejKdxr4J1tFGwnPCjW3Kw7LAdZa3w4SAFm9KeXEgSdI7KPP90rTVtYHKk1 +jzlfzoRFncG85vEkhwu3VGB5MRyI1upC0STxEhzu00upaNu+A+elWleAf8jZneN T/M3Nx+beWEwzRr9YxfDN1ASsVA49CZqEHjNUSV2laVdEyRLs0lOuA63emEiTcn9 iK9EkWBb/nB/c59LUmAadwv1wY7HKT6CNCuhDmrdT/7nuxEZWHofXGi1qR715068 rfG8KBieG4Vz/css8CUlfGPMEaFTLXQOtlmXpE2OCtBSBEMpkCEQrfKs1MUoe7xb 1DLOqg7GwTYVh+he9LEPTWerXddeORoJHBKeQ4VzOjCij3MR17hYDNPVO8pnzAHn XGwdZGxDsefQ8Zgk+gO+YJsTiQH0d8kWrhE4YGtpx4GDyPLcAtFSs54H/tt8mUkt quSwRoZU8eVfaPPgpYX6ig+Xj36/jXrHkCp968dKlt18W0vgsrwKNAOZ2vPSzskb TALOftr5fe8FT85FoKBs2DcNHC4gZLEQXbi+BKacXh4TQaW1vtbrrMlzxnYkj4z+ /NoqZf23DkSou1O5Dfw0jnumu9MzIeuZMAk/fCKFVXgAU8Kdk2CgR3qn10Efk31R P+iTzPGzZEAX9uvH9voB =f6wc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bIPxwDKrgObCseusVqxt3x682ut8qdjgS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B59882A-98ED-41B7-8F9E-C5B3DB6F2B4D>