Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:51:15 -0700
From:      Peter Losher <Peter_Losher@isc.org>
To:        Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, Murray Stokely <murray@freebsd.org>, stable@freebsd.org
Cc:        Peter_Losher@isc.org
Subject:   Re: [Peter_Losher@isc.org: More freebsd.isc.org issues...]
Message-ID:  <200310091751.15624.Peter_Losher@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20031009202308.0879ec30@209.112.4.2>
References:  <20031010001355.GA93439@freebsdmall.com> <6.0.0.22.0.20031009202308.0879ec30@209.112.4.2>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Just to clarify; freebsd.isc.org is running 5.1-RELEASE, not 4-STABLE.  

Best Wishes - Peter

On Thursday 09 October 2003 05:39 pm, Mike Tancsa wrote:

> We had one system locking up with nothing in the logs.  As it was
> inproduction, I didnt have too much of a chance to track it down. I
> speculated it was some issue with not having IPDIVERT in the kernel
> while ipfilter and IPFW2 were in the kernel.  Adding IPDIVERT in and
> turning off NAT on ppp and letting ipnat do its work over the PPPoE
> connection did the trick to stop it from locking up.  The box has been
> small s stable since then.  This is from an Oct 2 snapshot.
>
> The only other issue that comes to mind is tegge made a patch to allow
> maxim@macomnet.ru do a make -j64 work on a low RAM situation.  But
> that corrected panics, not lockups.
>
>
>          ---Mike
>
> At 08:13 PM 09/10/2003, Murray Stokely wrote:
> >Has anyone seen similar hangs on -STABLE?  I'd really like to get to
> >the bottom of this before we release 4.9 if possible.
> >
> >     - Murray
> >
> >----- Forwarded message from Peter Losher <Peter_Losher@isc.org>
> > -----
>
> From: Peter Losher <Peter_Losher@isc.org>
>
> >Subject: More freebsd.isc.org issues...
> >To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com>
> >Cc: Peter Losher <Peter_Losher@isc.org>,
> >         Murray Stokely <murray@freebsdmall.com>, mwlucas@FreeBSD.org
> >Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 02:06:44 +0000 (UTC)
> >
> >It happened again today - Any ideas?
> >
> >(heading up to power cycle the box now)
> >
> >On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Paul Vixie wrote:
> > > today sf1.isc.org (2/3 of ftp.freebsd.org) was down for a few
> > > hours.
> > >
> > > panic: spin lock sched lock held by 0x86a69be0 for > 5 seconds
> > > cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 00000000
> > > panic: spin lock sched lock held by 0x86a69be0 for > 5 seconds
> > > cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 00000000
> > > panic: spin lock sched lock held by 0x86a69be0 for > 5 seconds
> > > cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 00000000
> > > panic: spin lock sched lock held by 0x86a69be0 for > 5 seconds
> > > cpuid = 0; lapic.id = 00000000
> > > ...
> > >
> > > anything that requires us to drive all the way up and hit a reset
> > > button is automatically bad for uptime.  just so you know.
> >
> >--
> >Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must
> > flow"
> >
> >----- End forwarded message -----
> >_______________________________________________
> >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> > "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

-- 
Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200310091751.15624.Peter_Losher>