Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 21:58:38 -0800 (PST) From: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> Cc: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: To pick a (perl) fight! Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960313215734.1476C-100000@nervosa.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960313232247.15166C-100000@skipper.eng.umd.edu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, 13 Mar 1996, Chuck Robey wrote: > Perl 5 is in ports, do you really think we need _both_ perl and perl5? > Because I don't think we can dump perl yet. I think you can, considering that perl5 can run in complete perl4 compatibility. Plus as someone said before, we are going to have to rewrite our system perl scripts anyways, so why not do it now. > Chuck Robey chuckr@eng.umd.edu, I run FreeBSD-current on n3lxx + Journey2 == Chris Layne ============================================================= == coredump@nervosa.com ================ http://www.nervosa.com/~coredump ==home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960313215734.1476C-100000>