Date: Wed, 4 Jun 1997 15:58:11 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: ache@nagual.pp.ru Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-etc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/mtree BSD.include.dist Message-ID: <199706042258.PAA01401@vader.cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970605024737.3023C-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> (message from =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= on Thu, 5 Jun 1997 02:49:12 %2B0400 (MSD))
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
* Do we really need them as directories? I guess so, unless we mandate the source dist. You know where the symlinks are pointing at, right? * In any case some deeper level * directories not listed here, so I don't understand, how it is possible for * release. Why just not make symlinks _always_? Well, here on a release system (2.1.5 actually): === >> du 33 ./arpa 459 ./g++ 1 ./kerberosIV 358 ./machine 110 ./net 70 ./netccitt 136 ./netinet 189 ./netiso 48 ./netns 71 ./nfs 1 ./objc 22 ./protocols 30 ./readline 63 ./rpc 110 ./rpcsvc 5 ./ss 626 ./sys 27 ./ufs/ffs 21 ./ufs/lfs 12 ./ufs/mfs 38 ./ufs/ufs 99 ./ufs 91 ./vm 2928 . === These are all that is listed in BSD.include.dist. At any rate, I suggest you back out the change and ask Jordan for review. This is clearly his region as it concerns the release and not only "make world". Satoshihome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706042258.PAA01401>