Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 17:54:49 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> To: dragonfly dragonfly <dragonylffly@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How about porting LVS to FreeBSD Message-ID: <20050421075449.GE12673@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> In-Reply-To: <BAY19-F3618839AD6286B09EA6C6CDE2B0@phx.gbl> References: <20050419200039.GA12673@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <BAY19-F3618839AD6286B09EA6C6CDE2B0@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2005-Apr-20 08:55:17 +0800, dragonfly dragonfly wrote: >My meaning is to see whether it is useful. I think it is. I work with applications at work that run on HP TruCluster and I can see the advantages of using clustering to building HA servers. I may even have an application for it (though I'll need to study it in more details to confirm that). >So I only construct a framework to make it run first. It would be preferable if the kernel changes were distributed as diffs rather than replacement files - that would make it much easier to identify the changes. >My goal is to make it totally independent >to the Linux Compability codes.make it a absolute kernel modules,no need >kernel patches. Good. If we can resolve the licensing issues, this looks good. -- Peter Jeremy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050421075449.GE12673>