Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:19:01 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Pawe? P?kala <pawel@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts Makefile ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro/files pkg-message.in Message-ID: <4ED5F505.5070104@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20111130091253.GB4340@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111292232.pATMWINp021704@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111130015504.GB3953@FreeBSD.org> <20111130090313.00003930@unknown> <20111130080947.GA95193@FreeBSD.org> <4ED5F0CA.9010504@FreeBSD.org> <20111130091253.GB4340@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2011/11/30 10:12, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>>> Especially if "mixed" name looks just plain dumb and ugly. We should not
>>> uphold upstream's stupidity.
>>
>> No no. We should mirror the upstream as closely as possible.
>
> Please don't pass your personal opinions as project policies, thank you. :-)
I'm thinking you would be happier in Debian.
> Seriously, you really think that e.g. `audio/deadbeef' port (and plethora of
> others) should be named `audio/deaDBeeF' (official name is DeaDBeeF)?
>
> (In case of DeaDBeeF I do not consider this name stupid at all. It just
> does not fit as is into ports collection.)
Since it is the official capitalization used by vendor, I would not
oppose audio/deaDBeeF neither audio/DeaDBeeF (preferred).
--
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ED5F505.5070104>