Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:41:22 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Rob Simmons <rsimmons@wlcg.com>
To:        Brian Tiemann <briant@packeteer.com>
Cc:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, Ben Vaughn <bvaughn@BlackbirdTech.com>, Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org>, <security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Another glob problem
Message-ID:  <20010419213925.S83948-100000@mail.wlcg.com>
In-Reply-To: <3ADF8EFB.1B6EBA04@packeteer.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Make sure that you remove everything below /usr/sup/src-all/

There should be a file there called checkouts.cvs that could hose up a
fresh checkout.

Robert Simmons
Systems Administrator
http://www.wlcg.com/

On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Brian Tiemann wrote:

> 	Yes, I cvsupped immediately before rebuilding. That's the entire
> problem.
>
> 	The current best attempt has been to remove /usr/src and /usr/obj,
> cvsup to checkout a fresh 4-STABLE tree as of this afternoon, and try to
> build libc. But that's not working. So while what's causing libc to not
> compile is probably not related to the patch, what it means is that
> we're all effectively left without a solution to the ftpd overflow
> problem until the build error in mpool.c is dealt with.
>
> 	I cvsup 4-STABLE every night. I sort of thought that was what "tracking
> -STABLE" meant. It's so I don't have to worry about downloading patches.
>
> Brian
>
>
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 06:10:11PM -0700, Brian Tiemann wrote:
> > >       Well, that's great, but something needs to be looked at for those of us
> > > tracking 4-STABLE. Thanks...
> >
> > If you're tracking -stable, why not just cvsup?  We can't possibly
> > test the patches with every possible different point on the RELENG_4
> > continuum, so we kind of assume that if you've cvsupped once to get to
> > a non-release version of -stable you can do it again.  Having said
> > that, I can't think of any differences in libc which would have caused
> > this to fail between 4.2-REL and some later version of 4.2-STABLE.
> >
> > Kris
> >
> >   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >    Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE635PGv8Bofna59hYRAy1gAJ0bPosUHIAVItNcyQ1wmk7rZvXHnACeK1a1
z6/tCKdyZo19UrSbvaCaxck=
=z8cs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010419213925.S83948-100000>