Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:14:44 +0000 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make find(1) standalone - commit candidate Message-ID: <200203202314.g2KNEi4j080363@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <20020321100345.D11887-100000@gamplex.bde.org> ; from Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> "Thu, 21 Mar 2002 10:09:04 %2B1100." References: <20020321100345.D11887-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Mark Murray wrote: > > > > On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 markm@FreeBSD.ORG wrote: > > > > > > OK, except there are now (surprisingly, only) 3 clones of getdate.y > > > (the others are in tar and cvs), and the yacc stuff in the Makefile > > > is as bogus as before. > > > > Would it make sense to put getdate.y into some library (libutil?) > > It seemsto be reasonably suitable for putting in a library despite its > support for compile-time configuration. I don't like putting miscellaneous > things in libutil. That was a loaded question :-). There is a load of password-related crap pw_*.c that is crying out to be shoved into a library. I have sorta decided that libutil may be it. get_date() seems to be another candidate. I belive that $#|+loads of other programs doing "private" date parsing can also use this. M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203202314.g2KNEi4j080363>