Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 24 May 2002 03:55:20 +0200
From:      Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
Cc:        Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, chat@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: email vs. e-mail, was Re: cvs commit:src/sys/alpha/alpha clock.c
Message-ID:  <p05111721b91348e8c514@[10.0.1.8]>
In-Reply-To: <3CED8FF9.45DB8D2A@mindspring.com>
References:  <200205162121.g4GLLGQ43405@freefall.freebsd.org>	 <20020516220511.A9DBE380A@overcee.wemm.org>	 <20020517114010.A57127@regency.nsu.ru>	 <20020519100324.GK44562@daemon.ninth-circle.org>	 <20020519134348.I67779@blossom.cjclark.org>	 <p05111722b90de01cc974@[10.9.8.215]>	 <20020520195703.A79046@dragon.nuxi.com>	 <p05111701b90fb2744154@[10.9.8.215]>	 <20020521122955.A31528@chiark.greenend.org.uk>	 <p05111706b90fe527be6d@[10.0.1.4]>	 <20020524013232.C13780@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <p05111720b9133b509561@[10.0.1.8]> <3CED8FF9.45DB8D2A@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 5:57 PM -0700 2002/05/23, Terry Lambert wrote:

>  Contact:	greg@censoft.com

	Will do.

>  He wrote some of the first email software every written, as an
>  undergraduate at UCSD.  Greg was my boss at my first "real job"
>  after college.  Among other things, we shipped the very first
>  shrink-wrapped application software for UNIX.

	Looking at the rfc-index, the first relevant entry I find is:

0453 Meeting announcement to discuss a network mail system. M.D.
      Kudlick. Feb-07-1973. (Format: TXT=4572 bytes) (Status: UNKNOWN)

	However, looking through this file, they never use the term 
"email" or "e-mail".  They do use the term "network mail", however. 
They also use the plain "mail" term, as well as "NIC Journal mail".


	Looking through the RFCs, the earliest apparently relevant use I 
find of the term "e-mail" is in RFC 977:

    USENET uses a spooling area on the UNIX host to store news articles,
    one per file. Each article consists of a series of heading text,
    which contain the sender's identification and organizational
    affiliation, timestamps, electronic mail reply paths, subject,
    newsgroup (subject category), and the like.  A complete news article
    is reproduced in its entirety below.  Please consult RFC 850 for more
    details.

       Relay-Version: version B 2.10.3 4.3bsd-beta 6/6/85; site
       sdcsvax.UUCP
       Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83 SMI; site unitek.uucp
       Path:sdcsvax!sdcrdcf!hplabs!qantel!ihnp4!alberta!ubc-vision!unitek
       !honman
       From: honman@unitek.uucp (Man Wong)
       Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
       Subject: foreground -> background ?
       Message-ID: <167@unitek.uucp>
       Date: 25 Sep 85 23:51:52 GMT
       Date-Received: 29 Sep 85 09:54:48 GMT
       Reply-To: honman@unitek.UUCP (Hon-Man Wong)
       Distribution: net.all
       Organization: Unitek Technologies Corporation
       Lines: 12

       I have a process (C program) which generates a child and waits for
       it to return.  What I would like to do is to be able to run the
       child process interactively for a while before kicking itself into
       the background so I can return to the parent process (while the
       child process is RUNNING in the background).  Can it be done?  And
       if it can, how?

       Please reply by E-mail.  Thanks in advance.

       Hon-Man Wong


	Whereas the term "email" doesn't show up until RFC 1060:

Authors' Addresses:

    Joyce K. Reynolds
    University of Southern California
    Information Sciences Institute
    4676 Admiralty Way
    Marina del Rey, CA 90292

    Phone: (213) 822-1511

    Email: JKREY@ISI.EDU


    Jon Postel
    University of Southern California
    Information Sciences Institute
    4676 Admiralty Way
    Marina del Rey, CA 90292

    Phone: (213) 822-1511

    Email: POSTEL@ISI.EDU


	Continuing the back-and-forth consideration, the term "email" 
doesn't appear to be used anywhere in rfc-index.txt itself, except at 
the very top, whereas "e-mail" does occur in the titles of a number 
of RFCs.


	Counting sheer numbers, in my somewhat dated RFC archive, I find 
1244 uses of the word "e-mail" in 325 unique RFCs, but 6062 uses of 
the word "email" in 1904 unique RFCs.  However, a number of documents 
(296) seem to use both forms.


	Hmm.  Based on this, I'm not quite sure what to think.


-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
     -Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05111721b91348e8c514>