Date: Thu, 5 Sep 1996 00:01:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Bowden <jamie@inna.net> To: Theo de Raadt <deraadt@theos.com> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, terry@lambert.org, dg@root.com, darrend@novell.com, chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux 96 (my impressions) - Reply Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.960904235710.4862A-100000@spyder.inna.net> In-Reply-To: <9609042136.AA12381@theos.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, Theo de Raadt wrote: > > You gain the ability to 'prove' that your system is more secure by > > statements other than "it's more secure". When Marcus Ranum (formerly > > of TFS) states his system is secure, I believe him because of his track > > record. You don't have one positive or negative since OpenBSD has Lots of Theo rant deleted. > > > the FreeBSD security maintainer, about a hole to look at, I did not > > > get a reply. > > > > Stuff happens, does that mean condemning the process from that point on? > > When all things are added up, yeah, perhaps I should. > Theo, Would you please, just once, not take up your holy avenger? What's the point? Unless you care to offer proof of any claims, they are irrelevant, and less than worthless. If it takes extra effort for you to share your finds, then don't. This continuous taunting is tiresome and immature. Shut up just once in your life. Jamie Bowden Network Administrator, TBI Ltd.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.94.960904235710.4862A-100000>