Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:49:48 +0100
From:      Fabian Keil <freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de>
To:        freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r277806 - head/sys/dev/vt
Message-ID:  <693b2987.2b23d5b0@fabiankeil.de>
In-Reply-To: <CAA3htvspjiDV9_-fwwzLpjYZuA1fG1F3O0_sD02DvcL8b60bGg@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <CAA3htvspjiDV9_-fwwzLpjYZuA1fG1F3O0_sD02DvcL8b60bGg@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Sig_/4lwCHAd_gI=1bb=WdpUbVs.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Pawel Biernacki <pawel.biernacki@gmail.com> wrote:

> I found very worrying statement in that document:
>=20
> "2015-01-27: FreeBSD informs us that after going through their mail archi=
ve
> they found out that the same issue was reported by Google and that they
> missed it."
>=20
> How many other such mails were missed?

I can't answer this question, but I reported a couple of ggated issues
(DoS, non-critical memory disclosure) in December:

2014-12-09: Initial notification sent with potential patches.
2014-12-18: The mail was acknowledged and additional information requested.
2014-12-19: A more verbose description of the issue was sent as requested.
2015-01-15: I asked for a status update, preferably before FOSDEM.

I haven't heard back yet and don't know when the issues will be addressed.

Fabian

--Sig_/4lwCHAd_gI=1bb=WdpUbVs.
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlTIvswACgkQBYqIVf93VJ14jQCcC/BlMAPlBRQu9TAwA5YqIUxC
n6kAmwW5KMBPXjejziHVwGn8wM9D5/zR
=kDgM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/4lwCHAd_gI=1bb=WdpUbVs.--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?693b2987.2b23d5b0>