Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 16:47:12 +1000 From: Dima Panov <fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More if_ath churn coming your way! Message-ID: <792051295678832@web120.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikWQ4G6P-ePSDv6eXpUfnZ7vvDTSqSGr5sB4Pxe@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTikBpHcimOvSGdppc9CdhWguZNbTUEwan%2BQ172QT@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikWQ4G6P-ePSDv6eXpUfnZ7vvDTSqSGr5sB4Pxe@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! 22.01.2011, 13:56, "Adrian Chadd" <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>: > On 20 January 2011 13:51, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>; wrote: > >> šHi everyone, >> >> šI'm in the process of merging in the non-intrusive changes to the >> šif_ath code into -HEAD. > > Ok, so I lied - the ANI changes were slightly intrusive. But all in > all the code was just shuffled around a bit. > > Someone's reported that the AR9285 was once stable but now isn't. I'd > really appreciate it if others who are using AR9280/AR9285 chipsets > would test this out and get back to me. FreeBSD 9.0-900030-CURRENT #0 r217695M: Sat Jan 22 13:57:57 VLAT 2011 ath0: <Atheros 9285> mem 0xf0000000-0xf000ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci9 ath0: AR9285 mac 192.2 RF5133 phy 14.0 Signal strength is fine, no packets loss. ath 9285 was stable for me last months. Acer Ferrari One 200 laptop with half-sized atheros wifi card. > I'd like to make sure I fix all regressions before I start bringing > over more code from ath9k in preparation for enabling the basic > 802.11n support for testing. -- Dima Panov (fluffy@FreeBSD.org) KDE@FreeBSD team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=100000181104157
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?792051295678832>