Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 04:04:32 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ioquake3 support more platforms Message-ID: <4B2D9440.4070606@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <4B2D31C3.10108@FreeBSD.org> References: <4B2A52DB.5020602@bsdforen.de> <20091218065728.GC29158@lonesome.com> <4B2B681A.1090908@bsdforen.de> <4B2C888A.6000006@FreeBSD.org> <4B2CEA57.5050904@bsdforen.de> <4B2D31C3.10108@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: > Dominic Fandrey wrote: >> But this is not the case we're talking about (I explained the process >> in sufficient detail, I think). I take an up to date snapshot, apply my >> patch set, make a couple of test builds and runs, update the patch set >> until everything works as expected. Than I wrap the whole thing (SVN >> snapshot and my patches) up in a tar.gz and upload it to an ftp server. > > Well then I misunderstood what was proposed, and I apologize for that. > What you described is supported, and some ports are already doing it. I'm really glad this is just a misunderstanding, I was about to panic. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B2D9440.4070606>