Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 09:20:43 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@casselton.net> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: Performance of SheevaPlug on 8-stable Message-ID: <20100308082043.GT11192@cicely7.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <201003080300.o28303CD011298@casselton.net> References: <20100308021642.GQ11192@cicely7.cicely.de> <201003080300.o28303CD011298@casselton.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 09:00:03PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > <deletes> > > > It is still puzzling me why it is not near 80 seconds. > > This would mean it is loosing something about 5-6 cycles. > > Well - Ok - the pipeline might be that long and real loops are > > mostly some instructions longer. > > But I would still be interested to see Linux results on RM9200. > > Thinking way out of the box ... has anyone tried this in single user mode? Would be difficult for me since I have no loader to submit bootflags. Loader support is definitiv on my wishlist, but that's a another subject. -- B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100308082043.GT11192>