Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 25 Nov 2019 11:10:49 -0700
From:      Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>
To:        Florian Smeets <flo@smeets.xyz>
Cc:        Jan Sucan <sucanjan@gmail.com>, "Conrad E. Meyer" <cem@freebsd.org>,  svn-src-head <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>, Hiroki Sato <hrs@allbsd.org>,  svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r351423 - in head: . sbin/ping6 sbin/ping6/tests
Message-ID:  <CAOtMX2jZyh4ANF=Q2Ws_bxu5a8OhNuHo-Q-p0fYOinm4s1hAPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8259e67b-2f02-c02e-8aae-cbc8da896559@smeets.xyz>
References:  <201908231522.x7NFMLuJ068037@repo.freebsd.org> <20190826.042056.1329861772202588895.hrs@allbsd.org> <CAOtMX2hLxx=SKvh1ZoiMAcagQJjPaRSvkML9J%2BBgpQsz5uNNbw@mail.gmail.com> <20190826.050922.1810654532466043358.hrs@allbsd.org> <CAOtMX2jhmV%2BqRH%2BU1jMzdXsnckAvkzJhQiU6H65jUjdpK%2BXU3Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAG6CVpUULfa9KYWWRLwDxVS6UJ-s3GRGAcjXPo4a5yJjYRG_7w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOtMX2hjaYq%2B8_S0yXeAJutF2gNy3wgivmvOd=OV-iTByUdYKA@mail.gmail.com> <379c3378-f9dd-4d6b-35ca-fa1ac7e6386b@gmail.com> <8259e67b-2f02-c02e-8aae-cbc8da896559@smeets.xyz>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:57 AM Florian Smeets <flo@smeets.xyz> wrote:

> On 26.08.19 06:28, Jan Sucan wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I can implement it. I suppose that ping6's manual page should be kept it
> > this case.
> >
> > I was also thinking about printing a warning for each option renamed to
> > lead a willing user to use the new unified option set of ping. It could
> > be either only with -v, or by default and suppressed with -q. Or should
> > the option translation be completely transparent?
>
> Is there an update on this? I found out the hard way today, as I updated
> my icinga2 host from an revision before this change to a current
> revision. In this case it's not as easy as fixing a script e.g.
> net-mgmt/monitoring-plugins check_ping command calls /sbin/ping6 with -X.
>
> Will we get a ping6 that is fully backward compatible, or should we
> start fixing ports?
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>

Still a work in progress, though there hasn't been any progress lately.
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21434



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOtMX2jZyh4ANF=Q2Ws_bxu5a8OhNuHo-Q-p0fYOinm4s1hAPg>