Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 18:36:17 -0700 From: Tony Arcieri <tarcieri@atmos.colostate.edu> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern sched_ule.c (fwd) Message-ID: <20041215013617.GA11420@flash.atmos.colostate.edu> In-Reply-To: <41BF9130.9070907@freebsd.org> References: <20041214222444.GA9668@flash.atmos.colostate.edu> <3308.192.168.1.9.1103065723.squirrel@192.168.1.9> <20041215001222.GB9957@flash.atmos.colostate.edu> <3683.192.168.1.9.1103072060.squirrel@192.168.1.9> <41BF9130.9070907@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 06:19:44PM -0700, Scott Long wrote: > >I think removing the #error and putting a note on boot (and in UPDATING) > >that it may still be unstable is a good idea. However, Scott Long has > >expressed reservations > >(http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-December/044341.html) > >and his opinion counts orders of magnitude more than mine. > > > >Jon > > > > I'm definitely not against these fixes going into RELENG_5, but I would > like to see some significant testing be applied to them in HEAD first, > especially to changes that are not confined to just sched_ule.c (and > sched_4bsd.c). > > Scott Glad to hear it. So far hacking the ULE scheduler code from -CURRENT into the RELENG_5 sources myself seems to be working, but I would very much appreciate seeing these changes merged into RELENG_5 as soon as they can be adequately tested. Tony Arcieri
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041215013617.GA11420>