Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 10:13:28 -0200 From: Marcelo Gardini do Amaral <marcelo@registro.br> To: Dave <kreios@gmail.com> Cc: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de>, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS Performance Numbers Message-ID: <20061123121328.GC9038@registro.br> In-Reply-To: <77EFE6C7-96D4-4509-AC03-63F1AAE9BBA4@gmail.com> References: <20061030192702.GG76994@registro.br> <20061111091844.I63959@fledge.watson.org> <20061116164053.GR57732@registro.br> <455F1021.6040004@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <77EFE6C7-96D4-4509-AC03-63F1AAE9BBA4@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The FreeBSD pthread library and BIND don't work well together. If
> you use the libthr library, performance goes up.
I still didn't make tests with this lib, but I rebuilt everything on
FreeBSD 6.0 and got nice numbers:
DNS performance numbers on FreeBSD 6.0
queries / s
Int bind (d_t) bind (e_t) nsd (1_s) nsd (2_s)
--- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------
bge-UP 39682 26004 42070 41983
bge-SMP 37401 18272 42313 41092
d_t: disable threads
e_t: enable threads (libpthread)
1_s: 1 server forked
2_s: 2 server forked
Bind: 9.2.3
NSD: 3.0.2
bge: HP Blade BL35p, Broadcom NIC, FreeBSD 6.0
Client: Dell 1750, Intel NIC, FreeBSD 4.11 UP running queryperf
And running Bind 9.4.0b4 on the same setup:
queries / s
Int bind (d_t) bind (e_t) bind (e_a)
--- ---------- ---------- ----------
bge-SMP 37470 39063 39035
d_t: disable threads
e_t: enable threads (libpthread)
e_a: enable threads and enable atomic
Well, bge 'get along' in UDP traffic on FreeBSD 6.0.
--
Att.,
Marcelo Gardini
NIC .br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061123121328.GC9038>