Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 08:27:43 +0100 From: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> To: Antoine Kallab <antoine@kallab.com>, nightrecon@hotmail.com Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: unbound setup questions Message-ID: <55D42FEF.6030508@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <CAL2OafxzA9BkPR9Ud2NXO-_WJSaPcZHhqCMLBY3MOuEqn_E5yw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAL2OafxjzF1ZR_qyP8V0=tD%2BqHdfb7rohiH02UrrO5%2Bceyf7rw@mail.gmail.com> <mr0gtu$gi$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAL2OafxzA9BkPR9Ud2NXO-_WJSaPcZHhqCMLBY3MOuEqn_E5yw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19/08/2015 07:49, Antoine Kallab wrote: >> The unbound that ships with the OS is really only designed to be a resolver >> for the local machine, at least as far as I know at this point in my meager >> research. If you need services more like you may have been accustomed to >> with Bind you may wish to take a look at the unbound in the ports tree: >> /usr/ports/dns/unound. > > Thanks mike, installing unbound from ports did the trick. I had no > idea that local_unbound and unbound were different, thanks for that. I'm running the base unbound as a resolver for my entire net with no problems. The only difference I can spot between Antoine's config and mine is that I have domain-insecure directives for my internal domains. -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?55D42FEF.6030508>