Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 22:28:08 -0700 (PDT) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, Conrad Meyer <cem@FreeBSD.org>, Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>, "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity Message-ID: <202105220528.14M5S8nh015727@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfoJPB=-WMqH_Hd5ggGmY4GR2L7RJZpa_e9a2_ym5R4ZZA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:38 AM Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:57:17PM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > No, I don?t think there?s any reason to default it differently on stable > > vs > > > current. I think it?s useful (and I prefer the more verbose form, which > > > isn?t the default). > > > > I agree that there's no reason for the default to be different, but I > > would say that it is much easier for someone who knows that there is a > > default to be changed to change it, than it is for someone who does not. > > Therefore, if the information is not useful to someone who does not know > > how to get rid of it, then it should default to not being displayed, > > IMHO. > > > > I plan on changing the default for non-INVARIANT kernels back to > the old behavior. > > INVARIANT kernels will keep this behavior because it's a debugging > kernel and this is one more thing to help debugging problems. This seems a good solution to me, thanks! > Warner -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?202105220528.14M5S8nh015727>