Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 25 Jun 2002 12:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Ross Lippert <ripper@eskimo.com>
To:        pepper@rockefeller.edu
Cc:        FreeBSD-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: docs/39852: Handbook: treatment of KERNCONF is inconsistent.
Message-ID:  <200206251914.MAA18457@eskimo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20020625183950.84012A885@guest.reppep.com> (message from Chris Pepper on Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:39:50 -0400 (EDT))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

What? 

  device pcm

is in now part of GENERIC?

If not, then anyone who wants to get sound needs to build a custom kernel
at least once.  Back in the 3.X pre-pcm days there were good reasons why
you had to.  These days, there isn't.

Sort of a funny cycle of reasoning about custom kernels.  The people
who don't want to go through the trouble of learning about kernel
configing (let's call them desktop-heads) are the very same people who
like bells and whistles (aka sound).  The kind of people who really
don't want/need sound for their purposes (let's call them server-heads)
are pretty comfortable configing kernels, and probably are interested
enough in performance that they want to.

OK, I admit that post touched a nerve. :)

-r

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206251914.MAA18457>