Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:20:47 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts Makefile ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/x11-fonts/anonymousPro/files pkg-message.in Message-ID: <4ED5F56F.6090007@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4ED5F0CA.9010504@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111292232.pATMWINp021704@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111130015504.GB3953@FreeBSD.org> <20111130090313.00003930@unknown> <20111130080947.GA95193@FreeBSD.org> <4ED5F0CA.9010504@FreeBSD.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On 30/11/2011 09:00, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> No, thats just your incorrect interpretation. There is nothing
> prohibiting capital letters in port names except the first character.
I'm curious as to the reasoning behind this? Is it simply to
distinguish things in the ports tree that aren't either ports or
categories? (Makefile, Mk, UIDs Tools etc.) If so, then why isn't it
also /usr/ports/Distfiles and /usr/ports/Packages ?
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAk7V9XYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw5OwCeNc8azrIWSeZDnAUwp5n9VKBl
TosAn0w5Pjxtav+zZRCpyfWCR4rVTIXY
=uAt+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4ED5F56F.6090007>