Date: Sat, 11 Jan 1997 22:11:24 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) Cc: FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Partition naming [Was: Adding Hard Drives - Prepping] Message-ID: <E0vjICa-00032J-00@rover.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 11 Jan 1997 12:49:33 %2B0100." <Mutt.19970111124933.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> References: <Mutt.19970111124933.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <Mutt.19970111011604.roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> <Mutt.19970109225450.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199701101033.MAA27219@shadows.aeon.net> <Mutt.19970110203640.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <E0viwgc-0001BA-00@rover.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Mutt.19970111124933.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> J Wunsch writes: : What about backwards-compatibility to themselves? I think that's : the biggest issue. I believe they just did it since they hadn't done a release at that stage yet. They also bumbed the, to use the right FreeBSD term, slice code from a5 to a6 to denote new sytle systems. I'm given to believe that they support but, but haven't tried anything but all new since the change happened before I had a bootable kernel for my MIPS PC. : > I thought you could have up to four slices, not 7. Does FreeBSD grok : > extended partitions now? : : Uh-oh, Warner. :-) That's possible since FreeBSD 2.0.5. I think you : can have 32 slices or so (that's more than DOS can have, it has only : 26 drive letters :-). Cool. Way to go Bruce! 2.0.5 was the first release to have slices, if I recall, since I had to reslice and repartion my system when I made the 2.0 -> 2.1 upgrade (I skipped 2.0.5 for a variety of reasons). Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E0vjICa-00032J-00>