Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:43:51 +0100
From:      Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
To:        Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Cc:        src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-user@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r234649 - in user/andre/routelocking: contrib/ipfilter/netinet contrib/pf/net kern net netinet netinet6
Message-ID:  <CAJ-FndCzp9SgYkQ0nYumdkkAw=71Ag=zWgxbSFyQeUKjAMaNwQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201204241243.q3OChUqE048963@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201204241243.q3OChUqE048963@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/4/24, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>:
> Author: andre
> Date: Tue Apr 24 12:43:29 2012
> New Revision: 234649
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/234649
>
> Log:
>   hange the radix head lock to an rmlock (read mostly lock).
>
>   There is some header pollution going on because rmlock's are
>   not entirely abstracted and need per-CPU structures.
>
>   A comment in _rmlock.h says this can be hidden if there were
>   per-cpu linker magic/support.  I don't know if we have that
>   already.

Yes, we do, it is the DPCPU support.

Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-FndCzp9SgYkQ0nYumdkkAw=71Ag=zWgxbSFyQeUKjAMaNwQ>