Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:04:33 +0100
From:      John <tech-lists@zyxst.net>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Building "extra" kernels in stable/11...?
Message-ID:  <1468703073.2440830.668243017.7418A4E8@webmail.messagingengine.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160716205647.GW1261@albert.catwhisker.org>
References:  <20160716134746.GN1261@albert.catwhisker.org> <86mvlh7fjs.wl-herbert@mailbox.org> <20160716205647.GW1261@albert.catwhisker.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Sat, 16 Jul 2016, at 21:56, David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 05:45:11PM +0200, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> > ....
> > Well, I cannot reproduce this issue on my stable/11 machine.
> > ....
> 
> For good reason.  It turns out that I was so *sure* I had my kernel
> config files (for ALBERT & BATS) in place thta I didn't even check to
> verify that.
> 
> And when I did:
> 
> freebeast(11.0)[1] ls -lT /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/{GENERIC,ALBERT,BATS}
> ls: /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/ALBERT: No such file or directory
> ls: /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/BATS: No such file or directory
> -rw-r--r--  1 david  wheel  14315 Jul  8 04:00:47 2016
> /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC
> freebeast(11.0)[2] cd
> 
> Oops.  :-(  sorry for the noise.
> 
> Once I corrected that & re-tested... well, GENERIC built; ALBERT
> is building as I type....

Hmm, your problem was different to mine then, because my config file was
in the expected place. Otherwise the KERNCONF= option when manually
applied wouldn't have worked. 

-- 
  John
  tech-lists@zyxst.net



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1468703073.2440830.668243017.7418A4E8>