Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2014 12:12:33 -0700 From: Harshavardhana <harsha@harshavardhana.net> To: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@mail.turbofuzz.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD support being added to GlusterFS Message-ID: <CAAeUqd02pyWZhHmkSC1cauHL=qH_rU3gXs%2BDsHKJm3pjT5dhiA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0F20AEEC-6244-42BC-815C-1440BBBDE664@mail.turbofuzz.com> References: <C647EDA1-EA93-4A66-B59D-3B5F959DC0E0@gluster.org> <6ADBB2BF-C7E8-4050-9278-2565A63D2EA8@gluster.org> <20140627070411.GI24440@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <0F20AEEC-6244-42BC-815C-1440BBBDE664@mail.turbofuzz.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The patches are pending review and will be pushed hopefully this week! - can i get these installed on a Virtualbox instance and test the failures? Do not understand what is "poudriere" build? - is it like building inside a chrooted environment? The changes regarding "/var/lib" to "/var/db" are not complete with the diff, in-fact inside the code - "DEFAULT_WORKDIR /var/lib/glusterd" is hard-coded - and its only complete until all the references point to "/var/db/glusterd" I will be making these changes this week. Is "/var/db" the directory we all agree upon for "glusterd" configuration files? On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Jordan Hubbard <jkh@mail.turbofuzz.com> wrote: > > On Jun 27, 2014, at 12:04 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >> >> For you information here is my version: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/glusterfs.diff >> >> It is just missing the license bits >> >> if everyone here agrees I'll commit :) > > Unfortunately, I can’t get this to build under poudriere. It builds fine outside of the build jail, but inside, it seems to get tripped up on the patches. The previous version we also only got to build under poudriere by committing all sorts of terrible hacks against autogen.sh. FreeNAS 9.3, of course, also uses poudriere to build all its ports. :) > > Is there any chance of possibly just getting the FreeBSD-specific changes folded into the git repo (e.g. upstreamed) with suitable #ifdefs so that the port can be simplified a bit and hopefully made more poudriere friendly? > > Thanks, > > - Jordan > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse regulation with outcomes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAAeUqd02pyWZhHmkSC1cauHL=qH_rU3gXs%2BDsHKJm3pjT5dhiA>