Date: 18 Aug 1998 09:35:32 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: 026809r@dragon.acadiau.ca (Michael Richards), chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why don't winblows program have buffer overruns? Message-ID: <xzphfzau4hn.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Brett Glass's message of "Mon, 17 Aug 1998 12:50:04 -0600" References: <Brett Glass's message of "Sun, 16 Aug 1998 20:36:30 -0600"> <199808170244.UAA18362@lariat.lariat.org> <199808171851.MAA24710@lariat.lariat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> writes: > At 06:30 PM 8/17/98 +0200, Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav wrote: > >This is getting off-topic, but the bug is in the TCP/IP stack, not the > >NetBIOS code. The only reason WinNuke uses port 139 (the netbios-ssn > >port) is that you're pretty sure there'll be someone listening there. > I don't turn on NetBIOS on any Windows machine I use or administer. In > fact, about the only thing they'll respond to is a ping. You're not an average Winblows luser. Now let's please keep this thread off security. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphfzau4hn.fsf>