Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 02:04:56 -0400 From: Mike Makonnen <mtm@identd.net> To: Johny Mattsson <lonewolf-freebsd@earthmagic.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.1-R: rcNG - 'mountall' missing? Message-ID: <20030617060457.KSOY20810.pop015.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> In-Reply-To: <3EEE8780.4050804@earthmagic.org> References: <3EEE7A15.6070904@earthmagic.org> <20030617022842.KIUS27254.pop017.verizon.net@kokeb.ambesa.net> <3EEE8780.4050804@earthmagic.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 13:14:08 +1000 Johny Mattsson <lonewolf-freebsd@earthmagic.org> wrote: > > I'm not sure what the best approach would be, so I'd like some feedback > on this. Would it be acceptable to introduce another dummy target (like > FILESYSTEMS)? From a purely FreeBSD perspective I would probably find > this the cleanest, but I know we need to play nice with NetBSD too (do > they have anything like md or vn?) so that might stuff things up. > On FreeBSD all filesystems will be mounted by the time mountcritremote is done. Cheers. -- Mike Makonnen | GPG-KEY: http://www.identd.net/~mtm/mtm.asc mtm@identd.net | D228 1A6F C64E 120A A1C9 A3AA DAE1 E2AF DBCC 68B9 mtm@FreeBSD.Org| FreeBSD - The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030617060457.KSOY20810.pop015.verizon.net>