Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 13:09:01 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff <stdin@niklaas.eu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsync or git backups? Message-ID: <20160604110901.GG57978@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> In-Reply-To: <20160603190617.GR42477@ayvali.org> References: <CAKoxK%2B4MuSFi7ctcAXVzZ61mXzCsnP-qsWxEOTor_T1SFgc-cg@mail.gmail.com> <20160601173909.GB97464@ayvali.org> <20160603190617.GR42477@ayvali.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
N.J. Thomas [2016-06-03 12:06 -0700] : > There was a story on HackerNews about rsnapshot yesterday, the > discussion was informative: > > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11817701 > > Several rsnapshot alternatives came up during that discussion > > Attic - https://attic-backup.org/ > Borg - https://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ > Obnam - http://obnam.org/ Plus "bup" -- for the sake of completeness. I quickly read through the story and as I got it borg and attic are related while borg solved some security issue that attic has. Obnam is a different approach that has a "well documented filesystem" but can't do rolling checksums (whatever that is, there's a reference about that though). And bup is based on git. P.S.: Thanks for sharing the link! Niklaas
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160604110901.GG57978>