Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 23:07:51 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Peter_Ankerst=E5l?= <peter@pean.org> To: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packet-corruption with re(4) Message-ID: <E5BF765E-FCE5-4303-A26B-FF60EB9FB6FA@pean.org> In-Reply-To: <20080429120834.GB44737@eos.sc1.parodius.com> References: <C94C6F8A-C424-4C7E-955A-5E243BE4FABC@pean.org> <20080429120834.GB44737@eos.sc1.parodius.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 29, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> > > > I'd recommend staying away from Realtek NICs. Pick up an Intel Pro/=20= > 1000 > GT or PT. Realtek has a well-known history of issues. > > Just wanted to tell you guys that so far a em(4) seems to have fixed =20 the problem. -- Peter Ankerst=E5l peter@pean.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E5BF765E-FCE5-4303-A26B-FF60EB9FB6FA>