Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 12:28:41 -0600 From: John E Hein <jhein@timing.com> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: FreeBSD-emulation <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Missing libg2c.so.0 ? Message-ID: <17580.1241.631244.191605@gromit.timing.com> In-Reply-To: <25968985@bsam.ru> References: <20060704190921.GA73715@graf.pompo.net> <20060705113056.zdudl6ke80g8cwck@netchild.homeip.net> <20060705162636.8slkpmxus40gcsgc@graf.pompo.net> <20060705165624.sc7c4e2hc84o4s8o@netchild.homeip.net> <20060705173036.gglfyz1les8okcsg@graf.pompo.net> <92042366@bsam.ru> <20060705170230.GB40533@graf.pompo.net> <25968985@bsam.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Boris Samorodov wrote at 21:52 +0400 on Jul 5, 2006: > Yea, it's the library name, but the package name is > compat-libf2c-32-3.2.3-47.fc4.i386.rpm. ;-) > OK, let it be linux-libg2c. John E Hein wrote at 11:19 -0600 on Jul 5, 2006: > libg2c is part of the gcc-g77 rpm. =2E =2E > We probably don't want it in the fc4 linux base. fc4 uses gcc-4 > and gfortran as opposed to the old g77. I forgot about the compat-* rpms in fc4 (gone in fc5, fyi). But I don't think we should put compat-* rpms in the linux base port. Depending on old compat libs is not very "basic". If compat libs are needed, they should probably go in a separate port or ports. And perhaps that port should named with "-compat-" to emphasize that it contains less (or not at all) actively supported packages and for easier searches.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?17580.1241.631244.191605>