Date: Sat, 4 Apr 1998 05:19:57 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: jb@cimlogic.com.au (John Birrell) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: select problems Message-ID: <199804040519.WAA29024@usr01.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199804040146.LAA02914@cimlogic.com.au> from "John Birrell" at Apr 4, 98 11:46:45 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> OK, I've watched all the hooplah about things slowing down. Well here's > one that stops. select should at least be interruptable by a signal. > Using libc_r, a SIGINFO signal sent to a process should dump a thread > list. The threads signal handling leaves a little to be desired. I think the problem is there, not in the select stuff. > This is with a kernel built from sources cvsup'd within the last 4 hours. > > Time to back out those time changes, I guess. The time changes are the right thing to do. I think the patch to select is awful dirty, but no dirtiter than it not working, and Poul's going to replace it anyway, after talking to Bruce (from last reports). I would like to see the working patch (with the splhigh()) committed, and *NOT* backout the changes. If anyone could vote, that'd be mine. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804040519.WAA29024>