Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:29:05 -0600 From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lsof on FreeBSD/arm Message-ID: <48ad36516ffbabbecf6ab3c53031bfb3@thebighonker.lerctr.org> In-Reply-To: <1419367656.1018.142.camel@freebsd.org> References: <dfbaf5451abce25b512efe4f8c80ff58@thebighonker.lerctr.org> <1419362189.1018.138.camel@freebsd.org> <c9bcab9ff5aa4a67ec290908e72a53c9@thebighonker.lerctr.org> <1419367656.1018.142.camel@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2014-12-23 14:47, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 14:02 -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> On 2014-12-23 13:16, Ian Lepore wrote: >> > On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 11:29 -0600, Larry Rosenman wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> I'm the maintainer of the sysutils/lsof port for FreeBSD. It's >> >> been >> >> reported to me that the port doesn't compile on arm. In investigating >> >> that, I found that some of the includes that lsof includes need a cpu >> >> type defined in order to compile (machine/cpuconf.h). >> >> >> >> Is there a reason that there is no "default" cpu defined either by the >> >> compiler or environment? >> >> >> >> Playing in a armv6 poudriere jail, I found I can get it to compile >> >> via: >> >> borg.lerctr.org /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d $ cat p110armv6-make.conf >> >> CFLAGS += -DCPU_ARM1136=1 >> >> borg.lerctr.org /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d $ >> >> >> >> However, I'm not sure if that's kosher for a port to just define. >> >> >> >> Can any of the arm experts help here? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > See if the attached patch helps. The specific type of cpu shouldn't >> > really matter outside the kernel (or even inside it except in a couple >> > places), what usually matters is the architecture, which we've >> > simplified to v4 versus v6 for most purposes. >> > >> > The attached patch will use the compiler's predefined values for arch >> > to >> > set our old-school symbols, which we really need to do a big cleanup >> > pass on, but hopefully this little hack will get you going until that >> > gets done. Let me know if this works and I'll commit it. >> > >> > -- Ian >> Thanks. I'm having a hard time convincing poudriere to apply this >> patch >> to the environment >> >> Any ideas? > > Hrm, I seem to have fumbled the cpuconf.h attachment on the last try. > > -- Ian still get: --- dproc.o --- In file included from ./dlsof.h:90: In file included from /usr/src/sys/sys/conf.h:44: In file included from /usr/src/sys/sys/eventhandler.h:34: In file included from /usr/src/sys/sys/mutex.h:40: In file included from /usr/src/sys/sys/pcpu.h:48: In file included from /usr/include/machine/pcpu.h:35: /usr/include/machine/cpuconf.h:180:2: error: ARM_NMMUS is 0 so we still need some more help here. -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 108 Turvey Cove, Hutto, TX 78634-5688help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48ad36516ffbabbecf6ab3c53031bfb3>