Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:33:31 -0500 From: "Robin S. Socha" <rsocha@kens.com> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: sendmail vs. postfix question Message-ID: <20010201103331.L53804@kens.com> In-Reply-To: <E14OLP2-0005FC-00@post.mail.nl.demon.net>; from cliff@raggedclown.net on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:12:04PM %2B0000 References: <E14OLP2-0005FC-00@post.mail.nl.demon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net> [010201 10:13]: >> I once was faced with the same dilemma as you were. I finally decide >> to the Postfix way have not regretted my decision one bit. It was >> the easiest and fastest configuration I had experienced, a definite >> plus over Sendmail. Null argument, since the same applies to every other MTA, particularly qmail. > I want to endorse the comments below. No. You want to endorse this and fix your quoting. And while we're at it, don't think for a minute about Cc:ing me: http://learn.to/edit_messages > The author of Postfix has produced a realy solid, fast and > secure mail system. You may be interested to know he also > authored tcp-wrappers and the (in)famous satan program. > He also personally answers many of the questions on the > postfix-users@postfix.org mailling list. Wietse Venema is also extremely nice and friendly. /Un/fortunately, that has not much to do with security ;-) Anyway, postfix and qmail are indeed the MTAs of choice if you're looking for secure and fast ones. If you intend to run mailing lists, qmail's ezmlm is, however, /the/ #1 choice. Reply-to set. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010201103331.L53804>