Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 May 2010 15:35:23 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Wes Morgan <morganw@chemikals.org>
To:        Todd Wasson <tsw5@duke.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: zfs drive replacement issues
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1005161534120.92195@ibyngvyr>
In-Reply-To: <6FADBEDC-FF47-498A-BB17-0FCC163D3C8C@duke.edu>
References:  <0B97967D-1057-4414-BBD4-4F1AA2659A5D@duke.edu> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1005161352240.17439@ibyngvyr> <6FADBEDC-FF47-498A-BB17-0FCC163D3C8C@duke.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 16 May 2010, Todd Wasson wrote:

> > Strange, you should be able to cancel the replacement with detach. There
> > is some kind of DTL issue preventing it. I don't know what it is
> > precisely, but there are known cases where legitimate detach operations
> > are prevented.
> >
> > Try reconnecting the disk you partitioned, leaving the original ad6 still
> > attached, and you should be able to detach the new one.
>
> The problem with that is that I can't have any more than four SATA
> devices in my machine.  I'd have to detach one of the other (good)
> devices in order to do that.  Is that feasible / possible?  I would
> think at that point I would have only two of the four drives in the pool
> and it wouldn't function at all, but if that's not the case I can give
> it a try...

I wouldn't recommend that. What about attaching it externally, via eSATA
or USB?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1005161534120.92195>