Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 15 Dec 2011 05:47:15 -0600
From:      CyberLeo Kitsana <cyberleo@cyberleo.net>
To:        perryh@pluto.rain.com
Cc:        lists@midsummerdream.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: AHCI driver and static device names
Message-ID:  <4EE9DE43.4050402@cyberleo.net>
In-Reply-To: <4eea1a01.qEj3VB/DCaWfmK%2B8%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
References:  <4ED98E9F.9010401@midsummerdream.org> <CAN3mi_2u%2BHwFf3m%2BxvsNncfNpj_rFp94xjAv%2Bf0eFT7c4a%2B8Tg@mail.gmail.com> <4EDA489B.9060503@midsummerdream.org> <4EDA56A3.6090108@cyberleo.net> <4EE912BC.502@midsummerdream.org> <4EE955E7.4010708@cyberleo.net> <4eea1a01.qEj3VB/DCaWfmK%2B8%perryh@pluto.rain.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/15/2011 10:02 AM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> I suppose if someone wanted to track down the "official" way of
> solving this problem, they could look into how Windows handles it.

To my knowledge, Windows (XP, at least; probably others) labels the boot
filesystem on install, and just probes all disks every boot for a
filesystem with the given label. This is why you can move a Windows disk
around with relative impunity (as long as the controller drivers are
installed); but simply copying all those files to another filesystem
(a-la dump/restore on BSD) never results in a bootable OS, even if you
put them back in the same place.

This is also why booting with two attached clones of the same Windows
system disk is so fun.

-- 
Fuzzy love,
-CyberLeo
Technical Administrator
CyberLeo.Net Webhosting
http://www.CyberLeo.Net
<CyberLeo@CyberLeo.Net>

Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EE9DE43.4050402>