Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 18:57:45 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net> To: eivind@yes.no (Eivind Eklund) Cc: darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c Message-ID: <199804222357.SAA07088@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <19980423015125.15103@follo.net> from Eivind Eklund at "Apr 23, 98 01:51:25 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Thu, Apr 23, 1998 at 01:50:05AM +1000, darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au wrote: > > ps et.al. aren't that critical. Sure, it suck that they are that > way, but if ps is broken, _you can still get to the machine_. This is > not the case with IPFW. Having a structure-dependent interface for > the firewall is IMO not acceptable. I'm planning (have started) to do > something about it locally; I'd like to throw that code into FreeBSD, > but I'd like to know I'm not alone in thinking that an abstracted, > slighly slower interface for adding rules is a good change. > I agree. John To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804222357.SAA07088>