Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 05:59:46 -1000 (HST) From: Vincent Poy <vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> To: Dan Pelleg <daniel@pelleg.org> Cc: Dan Pelleg <daniel+bsd@pelleg.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Traffic Shaping? Message-ID: <20040206055415.D8264-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> In-Reply-To: <u2s65eknr5d.fsf@lark.auton.cs.cmu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6 Feb 2004, Dan Pelleg wrote: > Vincent Poy <vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> writes: > > > > > After reading ipfw(8), I hope I have it correct that it's > > like this: > > > > ipfw add queue 1 ip from any to any out xmit xl0 > > Shouldn't "ipfw add queue 1" be enough? Don't know, that was what I was told to do by Luigi many years ago except it was for PPPoE so I didn't have a static IP at all as that one was interface specific. > > ipfw pipe 1 config bw 384Kbit/s > > ipfw queue 1 config pipe 1 weight 30 mask all > > > > Now I'm just confused how to do the IP portion so that: > > > > 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 > > 209.204.138.224-231 > > are not included > > > > but everything else in 209.204.x.x is as well as any undefined IP. > > the first match wins. So: > > pass from 192.168.0.0/16 to any > pass from 209.204.138.224/29 to any > queue 1 from any to any > > alternatively, use a "skipto" rule. Whatever fits in your ruleset better. A question on the /29 one, as my ISP seems to give the 8 IP's from a /24 netmask, wouldn't the /29 actually filter out .224 and .231 from working or does it basically excluse that range. Cheers, Vince - vince@WURLDLINK.NET - Vice President ________ __ ____ Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] WurldLink Corporation / / / / | / | __] ] San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong / / / / / |/ / | __] ] HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____] Almighty1@IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040206055415.D8264-100000>