Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:17:09 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke <jahnke@sonatabio.com> To: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, nork@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: linuxpluginwrapper-20051113_8 Message-ID: <1221268629.5721.599.camel@pinot> In-Reply-To: <e71790db0809121800g6a83c49w6442dca48548ab53@mail.gmail.com> References: <1221264777.5721.596.camel@pinot> <e71790db0809121800g6a83c49w6442dca48548ab53@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 22:00 -0300, Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote: > I think www/nspluginwrapper is the best choice these days, since > linuxpluginwrapper seems to be an abandoned project. > I agree, and have been using nspw for quite some time. Still, if lpw remains in the ports tree, it ought to play nicely with the various port upgrading tools. Frank
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1221268629.5721.599.camel>