Date: Thu, 02 Nov 1995 11:00:16 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Jeffrey Hsu <hsu@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: More nits Message-ID: <11965.815338816@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 02 Nov 1995 02:13:36 PST." <199511021013.CAA24971@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Rather than yet another non-standard option, how about using the heuristic > that if a filesystem doesn't have to be fsck'ed, it's okay for the > mount to fail? The theory being that a fs which must be fsck'ed is more > critical than one which does not. Both the CDROM filesystems and the DOS > filesystems fit this heuristic. That would leave any critical NFS filesystems to slip through the cracks. I think David's right - another keyword is the way to go (but if nobody's going to ADD this keyword, I propose we do the rc hack I suggested! :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11965.815338816>