Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Aug 1998 16:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: GNU Binutils? (Was: re: gcc 2.8)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.00.9808261652370.233-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
In-Reply-To: <199808262057.NAA21770@usr02.primenet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 Aug 1998, Terry Lambert wrote:

> > Speaking of upgrading the compiler, what are the chances of upgrading the
> > binutils to 2.9.1 (at least for the ELF bits) in -current?
> 
> I think the general consensus would be "yes, you can update "ld" and
> friends, if you first make them grok a.out".

Uh, the a.out tools are separate (at least they're in seperate dirs:
src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils for 2.8.1, and IIRC src/libexec for the older
stuff, and 'sides, I think that it was decided not to merge in a.out
support into the newer binutils.

I for one would really like to see the binutils stuff tracked more
aggressively now that we've gotten a bit more up to date (esp if it fixes
these odd seg faults I see).

- alex

| "Contrary to popular belief, penguins are not the salvation of modern  |
| technology.  Neither do they throw parties for the urban proletariat." |
| Powered by FreeBSD                            http://www.freebsd.org/  |


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.00.9808261652370.233-100000>