Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:48:31 -0500 From: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: stable/8 nfsd: is it normal to have one worker regardless of -n setting? Message-ID: <20110801024830.GC59252@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108010232241.66711@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1108010232241.66711@woozle.rinet.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In the last episode (Aug 01), Dmitry Morozovsky said: > just noticed that contemporary nfsd does not fork children in accordance > to -n setting: > > stable/8: > > root@beaver:/usr/local/tb/scripts# pid nfs > 1745 ?? Is 0:00.02 nfsd: master (nfsd) > 1746 ?? S 0:03.29 nfsd: server (nfsd) > root@beaver:/usr/local/tb/scripts# grep nfs_server_flags /etc/rc.conf > nfs_server_flags="-u -t -n 4" They are threads now: # ps axw | grep nfsd 1373 ?? Is 0:00.02 nfsd: master (nfsd) 1374 ?? S 5:47.14 nfsd: server (nfsd) # ps axwH | grep nfsd 1373 ?? Is 0:00.02 nfsd: master (nfsd) 1374 ?? S 1:25.79 nfsd: server (nfsd) 1374 ?? S 1:26.65 nfsd: server (nfsd) 1374 ?? S 1:27.67 nfsd: server (nfsd) 1374 ?? S 1:27.04 nfsd: server (nfsd) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110801024830.GC59252>