Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 20:21:47 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/cdrtools-devel Makefile distinfo pkg-descr.mkisofs pkg-plist ports/sysutils/cdrtools-devel/files patch-ai patch-bb patch-cdda2wav::interface.c patch-cdda2wav::ioctl.c patch-cdda2wav::mycdrom.h patch-cdda2wav::setuid.c ... Message-ID: <20040412202147.B93652@newtrinity.zeist.de> In-Reply-To: <200404121747.i3CHleLS055095@green.homeunix.org>; from green@freebsd.org on Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:47:40PM -0400 References: <marius@alchemy.franken.de> <200404121747.i3CHleLS055095@green.homeunix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 12, 2004 at 01:47:40PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote: > > As to the quality being bad, did you submit the DVD-hack patches back to the > author? I don't think any of these things are really show-stoppers, just IIRC, I tried to contact him but didn't get an answer. > that it would be appropriate to make a non-slave-port that doesn't call > itself cdrecord or cdrecord-devel. I guess it depends on whether there are > users that would like to use this program on FreeBSD. Why in the world is Feel free to do so, I just don't want to have that DVD-patch(-option) in the cdrecord-devel port. Pav@ probably would be also interested in such a port. FYI, NetBSD has a "cdrtools-ossdvd" port, using yet another DVD-patch. > cdrecord-ProDVD binary-only, anyway? > Well, why is not all sofware open source and free as in beer?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040412202147.B93652>