Date: 09 Jul 1999 20:06:04 +1000 From: Julian Assange <proff@iq.org> To: Robert Watson <robert+freebsd@cyrus.watson.org> Cc: proff@iq.org Subject: Re: Syslog alternatives? Message-ID: <wxk8sai1df.fsf@yoshi.iq.org> In-Reply-To: Robert Watson's message of "Fri, 9 Jul 1999 04:20:13 -0400 (EDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990709041344.24202C-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson <robert@cyrus.watson.org> writes: > don't have a reference for it. I believe Schneier coauthored a paper on > some of the cryptographic issues, also. Again, no references here as I'm > out of town. If you can rely on kernel integrity due to securelevels, > then presumably you can have it hold onto secrets and provide certain > cryptographic integrity services. I don't like Schneier's paper very much. Seems to be an over-engineered patent stalking horse. Darren's nsyslog does cryptographic verification and transmission of its log data -- and keeps the log-files human readable. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?wxk8sai1df.fsf>