Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 14:55:16 +0300 From: Petri Helenius <petri@helenius.fi> To: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> Cc: developer@open-zfs.org, "<freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: l2arc compression leak Message-ID: <9E818A41-AEF6-4600-B12B-0539EE521B60@helenius.fi> In-Reply-To: <BBC2F0E8-670C-4835-A8A4-7F8900385C79@helenius.fi> References: <5AD0B5C0-7C72-46FA-86D3-7AFA8FA1E84E@helenius.fi> <CALfReyd9oKh-v307Zu_ogAtQ-y200uf__x=cmfL5iHM0cGwE=Q@mail.gmail.com> <BBC2F0E8-670C-4835-A8A4-7F8900385C79@helenius.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anyone know if this is fixed in the recent ZFS commits? Pete On 17 Jun 2014, at 11:24 , Petri Helenius <petri@helenius.fi> wrote: > > I wonder when this makes it to HEAD? > > Pete > > On 17 Jun 2014, at 10:04 , krad <kraduk@gmail.com> wrote: > >> thats really a decision for you as your situation is specific to you, and you get hit with the penalties if anything goes wrong. If its causing you a major problem in production and the risk/benfit ratio is worth it you could use it, but I would make sure you do rigorous testing first. However if you dont have a specific issue, i would hold off until its in stable at least. >> >> >> On 16 June 2014 07:40, Petri Helenius <petri@helenius.fi> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Recent FreeBSD 10-STABLE seems to be suffering from the L2ARC memory leak, eventually hanging on pfault. >> >> Should I apply this patch >> http://lists.open-zfs.org/pipermail/developer/2014-March/000535.html >> >> or wait for integration to SVN? >> >> Pete >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9E818A41-AEF6-4600-B12B-0539EE521B60>