Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 17:51:25 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenSSH HPN Message-ID: <86r3jwfpiq.fsf@desk.des.no> In-Reply-To: <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org> (Bryan Drewery's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 08:39:39 -0800") References: <86io5a9ome.fsf@desk.des.no> <56428E8A.3090201@FreeBSD.org> <56428F59.5010908@FreeBSD.org> <86y4e47uty.fsf@desk.des.no> <56436F4B.8050002@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Another thing that I did with the port was restore the tcpwrapper > support that upstream removed. Again, if we decide it is not worth > keeping in base I will remove it as default in the port. I want to keep tcpwrapper support - it is another reason why I still haven't upgraded OpenSSH, but to the best of my knowledge, it is far less intrusive than HPN. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r3jwfpiq.fsf>