Date: Tue, 4 Apr 1995 15:55:05 -0700 (PDT) From: julian@tfs.com (Julian Elischer) To: nate@trout.sri.MT.net (Nate Williams) Cc: terry@cs.weber.edu, kargl@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: new install(1) utility Message-ID: <m0rwHV3-0003w1C@TFS.COM> In-Reply-To: <199504042123.PAA07372@trout.sri.MT.net> from "Nate Williams" at Apr 4, 95 03:23:19 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Huh? Methink you don't understand the problem Mr. Lambert. > > trout:/usr/user/nate % ls -l /usr/include/stdio.h > -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 12938 Nov 22 04:38 /usr/include/stdio.h > trout:/usr/user/nate % [...] > > trout:/usr/user/nate % ls -l /usr/include/stdio.h > -r--r--r-- 1 bin bin 12938 Apr 4 15:19 /usr/include/stdio.h > trout:/usr/user/nate % > but if the Makefiles didn't see a reason to update it, then it would be untouched and the same thing would result. what we want is a make rule for X/a -> B/a (i.e. just moving a file) not to mention the trouble we have at the moment with man pages and that #$%^# gzip.. julian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0rwHV3-0003w1C>