Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 21:17:40 +0100 From: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> To: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question about poudriere "queued" ports? Message-ID: <CF2BEA98-599E-46D5-A257-F0573AAF8180@ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: <7aed4a65-f6ab-e179-9e1f-abd672e39b02@shatow.net> References: <f7a1d08d984fc50ed0e91e281815ee2a@ultra-secure.de> <27a8c236-1fc4-aacd-1274-00fb839b843c@FreeBSD.org> <67ebdf3d6e3956c61eac38eac1aa795e@ultra-secure.de> <7aed4a65-f6ab-e179-9e1f-abd672e39b02@shatow.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 06.12.2017 um 20:29 schrieb Bryan Drewery <bryan-lists@shatow.net>: >=20 > I knew this feature would be confusing. >=20 > The Queued table is literally what was queued to build initially = (after > filtering out unneeded packages). It is the full list of packages > Poudriere is trying to build. >=20 > It is *not* a "Remaining" or "Still" Queued list. It is an _Initially_ > Queued list. >=20 > You can see the *Remaining* ports to build by adding > HTML_TRACK_REMAINING=3Dyes to poudriere.conf but it can incur a > performance hit which is why it is off by default currently until I = can > improve it. >=20 > The Queued list is merely informational. It has no impact on > functionality. Poudriere is still "building everything like it used = to do". Hi Brian, it looks like you=E2=80=99re right. The ports were built, they just remained =E2=80=9Elisted=E2=80=9C. I was very confused by this. I only build a subset of the whole ports-tree, about 2000 ports - but I = didn=E2=80=99t really check to see if the packages were really there, = but they are. Maybe you could remove a package from the =E2=80=9EQueue=E2=80=9C once = it=E2=80=99s built? Sorry for the noise. Rainer=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CF2BEA98-599E-46D5-A257-F0573AAF8180>