Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 25 Feb 1998 12:05:40 -0800
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        freebsd@isvara.net
Cc:        Karl Denninger <karl@mcs.net>, FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: "Best" Fast Ethernet Card 
Message-ID:  <199802252005.MAA20744@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Feb 1998 19:58:20 GMT." <34F477DC.41FD810D@challenge.isvara.net> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Low system overhead is the key here.  I'm starting to see things that look a
> > lot like system CPU starvation with the SMC Etherpower 10/100s here on some
> > of our fileservers.
> 
> The recently released 3com Fast Etherink XL (rev B) 3C905B NIC is the best money
> can buy (apart from server cards costing upwards of 250UKP).
> It has lower CPU usage than any other card, helping it to give the fastest
> performance.

Uh, FTL has one of these.  It seems to work just fine, but I would say 
that at least for FreeBSD the Intel EtherExpress Pro 100B still gives 
you the best throughput:overhead ratio.

-- 
\\  Sometimes you're ahead,       \\  Mike Smith
\\  sometimes you're behind.      \\  mike@smith.net.au
\\  The race is long, and in the  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\  end it's only with yourself.  \\  msmith@cdrom.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802252005.MAA20744>