Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 14:44:07 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org> Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Nick Hibma <n_hibma@qubesoft.com>, Chris Dillon <cdillon@wolves.k12.mo.us>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc usbd.conf Message-ID: <20001018144407.D71470@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20001018052718.A372@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>; from nik@freebsd.org on Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 05:27:18AM %2B0100 References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001017123911.44965C-100000@fledge.watson.org> <xzpog0jt78y.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20001018052718.A372@canyon.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 05:27:18AM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > Didn't someone suggest a mechanism for contrib/ a while ago that would > support something like the ports files/patch-?? mechanism, so we could do > FreeBSD specific changes without pulling files off the vendor branch? Is there any reason why those wanting this will not first try submitting the patches to the vendor first? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001018144407.D71470>