Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:39:53 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Paul " =?iso-8859-1?Q?Richards=FC?= "" <paul@freebsd-services.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw permanent rules Message-ID: <200103210738.f2L7cof42204@gratis.grondar.za> In-Reply-To: <3AB857E7.D4CEBD40@freebsd-services.co.uk> ; from Paul "=?iso-8859-1?Q?Richards=FC?= " <paul@freebsd-services.co.uk> "Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:27:35 GMT." References: <3AB857E7.D4CEBD40@freebsd-services.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> What do people think of the the patch below. I think it is a nifty idea! > It sets a rule number below which rules will not be flushed. I've been > using it to install permanent rules, like SSH access from the office to > remote servers, so I can flush the majority of rules but keep those that > are essential to allow me to maintain connectivity to the box. Erm, could you do this as a unified diff rather - makes it a heck of a lot easier to read. :-) M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200103210738.f2L7cof42204>